Mon Sep 29 11:14:04 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] seq_id and tab_id unique across all sequences and tables?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_confirm aging issue?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
All, We have an application that uses time partitioned tables (day-based). We're in the early stages of implementing slony for database upgrades, etc. I recently got the entire database up and synched, and it ran over the weekend. We have a sliding window of time partitioned tables of 14 days. So, as of this morning the oldest three child tables were dropped on the origin, and three new child tables have been created, also on the origin. This morning I was going to manually unsubscribe the old child tables, and run a slonik script to add/merge the new ones. However, I noticed that on the receiver the parent table now has data in it, and the dates range from Sep 9 - today. Normally it does not, the data is only stored in the child tables which inherit from the parent. This would make the range start 14 days from when I set up the replication, last Friday. We replicate both the child tables and the parent. Can anyone explain this behavior? Should I not be replicating the parent table? Doug Knight -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080929/56982077/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] seq_id and tab_id unique across all sequences and tables?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_confirm aging issue?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list