Thu Sep 25 09:40:23 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Best way to send data between two remotes masters of slony cluster ?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 46] New 8.4 #include - utils/snapmgr.h
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 06:14:44PM +0200, Jérôme Jouanin wrote: > Why it seems a good idea to have 10 replicas at the "main" site ? Because > our production consists of several octocore / 24Go to serve 1000 queries / > sec and we have lag time constraint to replicate data <10sec. And obviously > we have backup databases at our main site. I find it hard to believe that the overhead of 10 databases isn't cancelling out some of the benefit you see. Just a couple such machines ought easily to stand up to the 1000 qps you mention, unless the queries are much more complicated than I imagine. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs at commandprompt.com +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Best way to send data between two remotes masters of slony cluster ?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 46] New 8.4 #include - utils/snapmgr.h
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list