Tue Jun 24 14:00:42 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Can a single table be in multiple replication sets?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Can a single table be in multiple replication sets?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, "Troy Wolf" <troy at troywolf.com> wrote: > So it appears I can't have a single table in more than one replication > set? How do I accomplish what I want? Your subset of tables must be in a separate set. Node 2 subscribes to both sets, node 3 subscribes to only the new set. -- Alan
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Can a single table be in multiple replication sets?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Can a single table be in multiple replication sets?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list