On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:55:42 +0100, Sebastien Lardiere <sebastien at lardiere.net> wrote:
> 
>>> Shouldn't node 2 and/or 3 be forwarder if you want to use one of them
> as
>> a
>>> master ?
>>
>> You're right, i enable forward for 2 and 3, and then failover work.
>>

Ok, it work, and i understand why i've got some error : 

- I have to set all direct receiver with forward = yes

- When I do failover, i have to wait before send "drop node" for remover the old master.

Perhaps somewhere in the documentation, it could be write that in case of failover, future master and direct receiver have to be set with forward = yes ? 

--
Sébastien