Wed Feb 27 04:30:05 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Failover problem
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Failover problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:53:35 +0100, "Stéphane A. Schildknecht" <stephane.schildknecht at postgresqlfr.org> wrote: >> >> Before failover, i've got : >> >> >> bar=# select * from _qsr_repl.sl_subscribe ; >> sub_set | sub_provider | sub_receiver | sub_forward | sub_active >> ---------+--------------+--------------+-------------+------------ >> 1 | 1 | 2 | f | t >> 1 | 1 | 3 | f | t >> (2 rows) >> >> And after too, because failover fail, and so nothing is done. > > > Shouldn't node 2 and/or 3 be forwarder if you want to use one of them as a > master ? You're right, i enable forward for 2 and 3, and then failover work. On 2, it's ok : infoctr=# select * from _qsr_repl.sl_subscribe ; sub_set | sub_provider | sub_receiver | sub_forward | sub_active ---------+--------------+--------------+-------------+------------ 1 | 2 | 3 | t | t (1 row) But on 3 , I've got a problem : infoctr=# SELECT * from _qsr_repl.sl_subscribe ; sub_set | sub_provider | sub_receiver | sub_forward | sub_active ---------+--------------+--------------+-------------+------------ 1 | 3 | 2 | t | t 1 | 2 | 3 | t | t And replication doesn't work anymore -- Sébastien
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Failover problem
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Failover problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list