Wed Feb 27 02:53:53 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] gmake rpm vs tarball
- Next message: [Slony1-general] gmake rpm vs tarball
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That's a while you answered me and i noticed i forgot to thank you. So please consider, that's done now. Btw, i'm not an nor an linux neither an hardwhare expert and i have a doubt in front of the 'i686' suffix of the rpm: Could you confirm that the rpm you suggest me will fit my box RHEL-4/386. I know i can make just an install test but i don't want to break (once more) my already succesful installed env ;-) Thx, 2008/2/14, Devrim G=DCND=DCZ <devrim at commandprompt.com>: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 13:22 +0100, lio bod wrote: > > I tried rpm -ivh postgresql-slony1-1.2.12.tar.bz2 > > Does not work. > > Use our yum repository to install Slony-I on your RHEL-4 box: > > http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/ > > > http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/7.4/redhat/rhel-4-i386/slony1-1.2.12-2.rhel4.i68= 6.rpm > > (or there is also an 64 bit version, if you need). This is built against > PostgreSQL 7.4, so you should not have any problems. > > If you don't have yum installed on your server and you have only > up2date, there is now way to use this repository (newer repo creation > scripts don't work with up2date). You can install packages > individually, of course. > > Regards, > > -- > Devrim G=DCND=DCZ , RHCE > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting > Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080227/= b279569e/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] gmake rpm vs tarball
- Next message: [Slony1-general] gmake rpm vs tarball
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list