Wed Feb 20 07:56:04 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] narrowing down this problem
- Next message: [Slony1-general] other replication solutions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Geoffrey wrote:
>
>> "tract_order_num_key" unique, btree (order_num)
>>
>> So, this application has been running along just fine like this for a
>> couple of years. Is it possible that the above index is causing the
>> problem?
>
> slony won't care about this index. all it cares is that you have a
> primary key defined for the table. your above key does not qualify as a
> primary key.
Understood. We do have a primary key on this index:
Indexes:
"tract_pkey" primary key, btree (recid)
"tract_order_num_key" unique, btree (order_num)
"tract_assigned" btree (assigned)
"tract_code" btree (code)
"tract_comments" btree (comments)
"tract_compound_1" btree (code, old_order_num)
"tract_date_avail" btree (date_avail)
"tract_dest_state" btree (dest_state)
"tract_dest_zone" btree (dest_zone)
"tract_driver" btree (driver)
"tract_orig_state" btree (orig_state)
"tract_orig_zone" btree (orig_zone)
"tract_prebooked" btree (prebooked)
"tract_tractor_num" btree (tractor_num)
"tract_trailer_num" btree (trailer_num)
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] narrowing down this problem
- Next message: [Slony1-general] other replication solutions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list