Wed Feb 20 07:56:04 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] narrowing down this problem
- Next message: [Slony1-general] other replication solutions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Geoffrey wrote: > >> "tract_order_num_key" unique, btree (order_num) >> >> So, this application has been running along just fine like this for a >> couple of years. Is it possible that the above index is causing the >> problem? > > slony won't care about this index. all it cares is that you have a > primary key defined for the table. your above key does not qualify as a > primary key. Understood. We do have a primary key on this index: Indexes: "tract_pkey" primary key, btree (recid) "tract_order_num_key" unique, btree (order_num) "tract_assigned" btree (assigned) "tract_code" btree (code) "tract_comments" btree (comments) "tract_compound_1" btree (code, old_order_num) "tract_date_avail" btree (date_avail) "tract_dest_state" btree (dest_state) "tract_dest_zone" btree (dest_zone) "tract_driver" btree (driver) "tract_orig_state" btree (orig_state) "tract_orig_zone" btree (orig_zone) "tract_prebooked" btree (prebooked) "tract_tractor_num" btree (tractor_num) "tract_trailer_num" btree (trailer_num) -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] narrowing down this problem
- Next message: [Slony1-general] other replication solutions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list