Fri Apr 4 04:49:20 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Feature request for next slony version: initial replication of large DBs
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_log indexes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 10:26 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > Cyril SCETBON <scetbon at echo.fr> writes: > > As said Christopher Brown new commands are coming : CLONE PREPARE and > > CLONE FINISH to bypass this mecanism > > > > see http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2008-January/002145.html > > They do, to a degree, but not completely. The CLONE commands operate > on subscribers, so you need to have at least one subscriber in order > to start cloning. > > It would be in principle possible to do a "clone" against a master; we > prepared a gedanken experiment as to how this would be done... It > would require a slight outage to establish a synchronization point, > which makes it somewhat problematic, and which is why we haven't > pursued the more extensive cloning. Will an outage of 100 msec be enough ? You just need a point where there is no active transactions ? Maybe one should look, how this was achieved fro CONCURRENT VACUUM; ---------- Hannu
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Feature request for next slony version: initial replication of large DBs
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_log indexes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list