Mon Apr 7 17:32:59 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] autovacuum doc change
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: Failover versus Store Node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
While trying out different scenarios in Slony (ver 1.2.9) I came across the following: When I did a failover on a node and made it back online again without doing an uninstall or delete on it, I was still able to see it in the sl_node table with active status and this is why when I did a subscribe again for the failed node (without a delete) I didnt get any error through slonik and I could see the entry in sl_subscribe for the failed node but the replication was not working for this node. Now in the other scenario when I did a store node and store node (without subscribe) for a fresh node to a cluster I could see in the sl_node table having exactly the same kind of entry as the failed node in sl_node table. I will like to know how can I differentiate between a failed node and a recently added node (without subscriptions) from the slony catalog tables? Thank you, Shoaib Mir Fujitsu Australia Software Technology shoaibm at fast.fujistu.com.au -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080408/= 2a598662/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] autovacuum doc change
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: Failover versus Store Node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list