Bill Moran <wmoran at collaborativefusion.com> writes:
> In response to Christopher Browne <cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info>:
>
>> 1...  The filenames contain the node number, which is
>> anti-functional...
>> 
>>  slony1_log_2_00000000000000000115.sql  slony1_log_3_00000000000000000185.sql
>
> By anti-functional, do you mean that it causes confusion when handling the
> log files after they've been created?
>
> I don't think having the node # in the name is bad, I just think that's
> a bad place for it.  I would recommend:
>
> slony1_log_00000000000000000115_node_2.sql
>
> Which keeps the node information in the name, makes it more apparent
> what it is, and allows shell tools to sort the files correctly.
>
> Good?  Bad?  Better ideas?

Perhaps I spake too strongly ;-).

Yeah, having it *after* the ID number would make it a lot less
inconvenient.
-- 
"cbbrowne","@","linuxfinances.info"
http://linuxfinances.info/info/lsf.html
:FATAL ERROR -- ATTEMPT TO USE CANADIAN COINS