Thu Mar 8 14:51:31 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Architectural guidance - cascaded replication
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Architectural guidance - cascaded replication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/8/07, Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb at commandprompt.com> wrote: > On March 8, 2007 05:31 am, John Goetsch wrote: > > The question is: should all the nodes be one cluster ie master, slave > > and all subnodes, or should I have one cluster for the master-slave > > replication and one cluster for the slave-multinode replication. > > > > I can't seem to find the policy/rules/conventions about cluster creation. > > A single cluster with multiple sets. > > One set is the subset of relations that you want to cascade, the other set is > the non cascaded relations. As Darcy says, however be aware that you need to have the exact same schema on all the members of the cluster. For example, you need tables to exist on the slaves even if you're not replicating data into them. See the email to slony1-general list on 2007-Feb-20 from Sven Willenberger, subject "EXECUTE SCRIPT operates on non set member tables". I'd link to the mailing list archives, but they seem to be broken following the move. Andrew
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Architectural guidance - cascaded replication
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Architectural guidance - cascaded replication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list