On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Christopher Browne wrote:


I've downloaded the tarball can compiled against a 8.3 snapshot on Linux an=
d =

I'm still getting periodic failures of the testddl unit test.

Usually its a <stdin>:9: timeout exceeded while waiting for event confirmat=
ion

I keep seeing messages along the line in the slon.2.log like:
2007-06-13 19:25:20 EDT WARN   remoteWorkerThread_1: copy set: data provide=
r =

1 only on sync -1 - sleep 5 seconds

Is this the problem Jan is working on or is it something else?
Has anyone else tried to run the testddl unit test a handful of times with =

better luck?




> Devrim G=DCND=DCZ wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:12 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
>>
>>> I have not seen any results of other peoples' testing yet; would
>>> appreciate hearing that others were trying out 1.2.10 from CVS with
>>> some success (lack thereof is also useful).
>>>
>>
>> I would like to commit my spec file *after* 1.2.10 is ready in CVS (and
>> there is a test tarball around). Please do not release 1.2.10 before I
>> commit it -- Slony-I is under review by Fedora people and I expect to
>> see it in Fedora RSN.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
> I have seen commits on the spec file even though I haven't yet generated
> a test tarball; have you made the changes you need?  Or is there still a
> need to wait?
>
> I'm thinking I should tag now, and generate a tarball, now, marked as
> being "pre-1.2.10", to ease more testing even before Jan gets to the log
> shipping fix that is presently O/S...  I can't do any work this
> afternoon, so we might as well have something that's more testable for
> now...
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>