On Dec 30, 2007, at 3:42 PM, cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote:

> It's probably plausible to hunt this down, and if there has been no  
> work,
> to not bother with the ROLLBACK, however, I don't think it fixes  
> terribly
> much.
>
> But from a "paranoid programming" perspective, I'd rather be a little
> paranoid and *always* ROLLBACK at the end of the COPY_SET attempt,  
> even at
> the cost of the (not worrisome) warnings that you're seeing here.

Sounds like a plan to me!  But the part that confused me was it only  
happened on the subsequent subscribe attempts; not on the initial.