On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:28:20PM +0100, cichy wrote:
> 
> So, it is not possible to make those records stay in the replicated
> table in slave DB without adding there another table which will gather
> data?
> Maybe logging trigger could be modified or wrapped somehow, so it
> doesn't log certain deletions?

I suppose that with enough hacking on it, you could do this, but I'd suggest
against it.  I know that there's a proposal afoot to do pre-filtering of
change applications.  I think it was discussed on list here a couple months
ago.

A