Fri Aug 31 06:51:09 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: Bug in slonik SQL parser: comments are not removed properly
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: Bug in slonik SQL parser: comments are not removed properly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:18:07PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: > Exactly. We don't have enough developers. And I truly think that we have > much bigger fish to fry than supporting complicated comment structures. That's ok with me; my point is just that we can't dismiss this. So. . . > The way I see it is that we will change our parser to simply REJECT a > DDL script if there is any /* style comment in there at all, document it > that way and be done with it. At least it won't allow to break > replication any more. . . .this sounds ok to me. The non-breaking part is what's important. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are against all taxes for raising money to pay it off. --Alexander Hamilton
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: Bug in slonik SQL parser: comments are not removed properly
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: Bug in slonik SQL parser: comments are not removed properly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list