Thu Aug 30 11:46:39 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: Bug in slonik SQL parser: comments are not removed properly
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: Bug in slonik SQL parser: comments are not removed properly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:49:40PM +0400, Dmitry Koterov wrote: > > Just because Postgres itself allows it doesn't mean that every piece of > > software working with Postgres must be aware of this, does it? > Possibly. > > But it is too bad to completely break the replication on a syntax error in > DDL script, I suppose. I have to agree with Dmitry here. If the Postgres parser allows it, I think we _do_ have to be aware of it. Slony isn't like "every piece of software working with Postgres", after all -- we advertise as being a replication engine. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace. --Philip Greenspun
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: Bug in slonik SQL parser: comments are not removed properly
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: Bug in slonik SQL parser: comments are not removed properly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list