Wed Aug 1 20:03:38 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] problems with slony1-1.2.10 and postgresql-8.2.4
- Next message: [Slony1-general] problems with slony1-1.2.10 and postgresql-8.2.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/1/07, Jeff Frost <jeff at frostconsultingllc.com> wrote: > > When I upgrade I put Postgres / Slony into a unique directory for each > > build (for example /usr/local/pgsql-8.2.4-2007080101 and > > /usr/local/slony-1.2.10-2007080101) and then symlink that folder to > > the same folder name without the version so I don't have to bother > > updating paths and startup scripts. > > I do that as well for the slony installs, but again, postgres is installed via > rpm. I wonder if the 8.2.4 rpm is built on a 64bit machine? I would recommend compiling both postgresql and slony from source. -Dave
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] problems with slony1-1.2.10 and postgresql-8.2.4
- Next message: [Slony1-general] problems with slony1-1.2.10 and postgresql-8.2.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list