Hi again, 

I reconstructed the scenario. 

I do not have the error that I've received last week, but now I have this:

2007-04-16 10:41:08 EEST WARN   remoteWorkerThread_1: copy set: data
provider 1 only on sync -1 - sleep 5 seconds 

Scenario:
A	b	c 	- databases 
t1 ->	t1		- set 1
t2	t2 ->	t2	- set 2
T3 ->	t3 	t3	- set 3
t4 --------> t4	- set 4
 
When I subscribe the set 4 ->> subscribe set (id=4, provider=1, receiver=3,
forward=yes); 

Then I receive the upper message. 

The rest of replication works well. 

c.t2 is ok replicated. 
c.t4 is not replicated. 



Andy.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: slony1-general-bounces at lists.slony.info 
> [mailto:slony1-general-bounces at lists.slony.info] On Behalf Of 
> Andrew Sullivan
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 5:32 PM
> To: slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Can this be done with slony?
> 
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 05:16:08PM +0300, Andy wrote:
> > As error I received somehting similar to:
> > slony  node -1 not found in runtime configuration or something 
> > similar, I don't have the error now.
> 
> Going to be hard to diagnose without the error message.
> 
> >  
> > Ok, the main question would be: can a node subscribe to multiple 
> > different sets/providers?
> 
> Sure.  It's one of the reasons for the idea of a set.
> 
> 
> --
> Andrew Sullivan  | ajs at crankycanuck.ca
> The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
> 		--George Orwell
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
> 
>