On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Niels Breet wrote:

> On Tue, September 19, 2006 01:11, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> As a pgFoundry admin, I have to say that I'm really let down by the
>> Slony-I
>> team on this one.  If there are issues with pgFoundry (and there are) then
>>  we'd like your help in resolving them (since most of them relate to
>> manpower).   Having Slony-I run off and start its own site with
>> completely separate infrastructure doesn't help any of the other users of
>> pgFoundry, and just compounds the "does PostgreSQL have replication or
>> not" problem.
>>
>> If your conclusion is that pgFoundry is borked and we need to replace it
>> with something else *in general*, then let's replace it.
>
> The problem with pgFoundry atm is this: (correct me if I'm wrong, this all
> what I gathered from IRC chats)
> - current jail runs on a server that is not controlled by the community?

Dave Page is being setup with full root (and iLO) access to the server ... 
time hasn't been in my favor the past week getting some servers rebuilt 
and online, else that would have been done by now ...

> - current server is overloaded/ not reliable

current server is a brand new HP Proliant server, and is definitely not 
overloaded ... in fact, the biggest 'load' on the server it is currently 
on is postgresql.org ... *gborg* used to be on an overloaded server, but 
that has been moved to the same server as pgfoundry/postgresql.org ...

> - nobody has access to the database it is running on.

Only because it hasn't been moved into the vServer itself, something that 
is planned for within the next week ...