On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:11:19PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> If your conclusion is that pgFoundry is borked and we need to replace it 
> with something else *in general*, then let's replace it.

I think the conclusion is twofold:

1.	pgFoundry is not sustainable in the long run, because of the
problems Chris raised.

2.	We need something _right now_, because it's plain that gborg
isn't a reasonable holding pattern any more.

If it weren't for (2), we could decide on something else to replace
pgFoundry, &c.  But as things stand, my bet is that will take ages. 
In addition, there are all the people who've moved from gborg to
pgfoundry: it seems sort of unfair to them to make them do _another_
move.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs at crankycanuck.ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
		--Roger Brinner