Mon Nov 20 08:40:28 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] rewrap 1.2.1?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] rewrap 1.2.1?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Nov 17, 2006, at 6:41 PM, David Rees wrote: > On 11/17/06, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim at commandprompt.com> wrote: >> As you have possible seen, today I committed some fixes to sgml docs. >> Without them, I can't build the RPM package (or people cannot build >> docs). >> >> Should we consider a rewrap? > > I personally hate rewraps, version numbers are cheap, just re-roll the > release as 1.2.2. for something like this, i'd suggest 1.2.1a. one should *never* re-roll released tar balls. remember that this is how the openssh break-in was detected: many people reported checksum mismatches on the tarball when it changed. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2530 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20061120/7729d3b3/attachment-0001.bin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] rewrap 1.2.1?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] rewrap 1.2.1?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list