Devrim GUNDUZ devrim
Wed Nov 8 12:38:21 PST 2006
Hi,

On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 16:09 +0000, Christopher Browne wrote:
> I don't see that 1 line change being something that would cause a big
> problem if we had the wrong value in 1.2.1; you'll be building the
> packages afterwards, anyways.

I committed several fixes on spec file:

- On 64-bit boxes, both 32 and 64 bit -devel packages may be installed.
Fix version check script
- Revert tar name patch
- Macros cannot be used in various parts of the spec file. Revert that
commit
- Spec file cleanup

I also updated the spec file under redhat/ directory. I can now build
packages on 32 and 64 bit platforms.

I also fixed some sgml files.

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20061108/c6f02a8a/attachment.bin 



More information about the Slony1-general mailing list