On 11/8/2006 2:17 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>> On 10/31/2006 6:03 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
>>> In the 1.1 branch, a number of minor bugs have been dealt with; in
>>> both branches, the following more significant changes have been made:
>>
>> These release candidates have been out for over a week now and there
>> has been literally zero feedback. Is ANYONE at all testing these at all?
> There has been a bunch of feedback on the altperl tools, patches for RPM
> spec files, fixes to version numbers.  Someone pointed out that one of
> the scripts in HEAD hadn't gotten into 1_2_STABLE; I fixed that.
> 
> Admittedly, no comments on the MERGE SET change.

Maybe I wasn't too clear. I didn't mean the tools and gadgets around 
Slony, I meant how the replication engine itself works, what people 
found when testing their failover an other maintenance procedures. How 
are we supposed to tell folks that upgrading from 1.1 to 1.2 is a good 
thing for production systems, if nobody has done that on their test systems?


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #