> On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:03:48PM -0800, Jeff Frost wrote:
>>> Interesting.  This table has never been part of the subscription set,
>>> would it
>>> have added these catalog manipulations anyway?
>>
>> Sort of.  Likely, something has collided.  The general rule is, I
>> think, very clear: no DDL at all if you don't do it through EXECUTE
>> SCRIPT.
>
> This was definitely what was needed to drop the table in question.
>
> Maybe we can add this to the doc or the FAQ?  I certainly would not have
> thought I needed to use execute script to drop non-replicated tables based
> on
> the docs in adminguide/ddlchanges.html.  Maybe I didn't look hard enough
> in
> the docs?

You looked hard enough; this scenario is a bit surprising...

If we can characterize it a bit better, that would be nice...