Mon May 22 12:33:56 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Change the slave's table name
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Change the slave's table name
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:48:46AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > It's tricky, but you can often do it without application changes, as > > long as you never do something dumb like SELECT *. > > Maybe I missed something, but wasn't the OP trying to replicate data > from slaves back up to the master? I didn't have that impression: I had the impression of many remote machines, and one central one that shared their data. If this is to be two-way, then it does indeed become more tricky (although the same general strategy might be made to work). A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Change the slave's table name
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Change the slave's table name
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list