Wed Mar 22 09:00:38 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slon not catching up
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slon not catching up
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Would welcome any suggestions for a better query to check the
> health of
> the set.
My simple test, which I use from a nagios monitoring plugin, is this:
SELECT date_part('epoch',st_lag_time)::INTEGER FROM _$
{cluster}.sl_status WHERE st_origin=$origin_node AND st_received=
$subscriber_node
It gives me the number of seconds behind the subscriber is, which is
for me the most important measure. The lag_time is based on last
event timestamp. I suspect both queries give basically the same info
in the end.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slon not catching up
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slon not catching up
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list