On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 17:59, cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote:
> > Are
> > the problems related to the fact that there's  no way to catch blob
> > updates using triggers ?
> 
> Head.  Nail.  Struck on...
> 
> Yes, that is exactly the problem with BLOB support.  There isn't a way to
> detect updates to BLOB objects via triggers.
> 

OK... but the partial support with explicitly stating you shouldn't
update blobs would work out ? For us that would be sufficient, we don't
update blobs. We might _replace_ a blob, but never update the content
directly... I guess that would be tractable, right ?

If you hint me it's not very hard to hack that in I could try to do it
locally and experiment a bit...

Thanks,
Csaba.