On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:07:53PM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> Thus, you might have set #1, replicating from node 101 to node 102.
> 
> And you have set #2, replicating from node 201 to node 202.
> 
> Replication works fine with each set; it's just that confirmations don't
> make it back, and so sl_log_1 never gets cleaned out :-(.
> 
> If you aren't using that sort of "disjoint set" pattern of replication,
> then you shouldn't have a problem.

Would simply subscribing all nodes to a table that never gets updated
fix this as well? ISTM that might be easier than fiddling with
listen_path...
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby at pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461