On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 15:36 -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> Also, can the CMD folks comment on what kind of timetable is
> >> reasonable to do the move?
> >
> > We can have a server up fairly quick... as soon as I can get off my  
> > hill
> > (snowed in).
> 
> So if we as a community decide on a December 15 date to finish the  
> move, would that be reasonable?  Assuming that the massaging of the  
> bug tickets into whatever new system would be  doable in that time.

Yes. I could have the server installed early next week.

> 
> And if you're using trac internally, I vote we use trac for this  
> project too :-)

We use Trac for all customer and CMD projects. Trac however does have
it's downsides. Namely it is not designed for *sign up*. Which means
that you either allow anonymous tickets (and thus spamming), you only
allow specific people to submit tickets, or we develop a signup system.

A signup system, honestly is about 1 full day worth of work, so it is
completely doable and does give us the wonderful interface to SVN + the
wiki.

I setup bugzilla because the latest versions (I don't even know if it is
actually officially released) will work with CVS. Bugzilla is designed
to work with *large* projects. Trac is not. 

They are different products and they really should each be evaluated on
their own merits.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



> 
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
> 
-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate