Sat Aug 5 08:52:51 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony-I 1.2.0 RC2 status
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony-I 1.2.0 RC2 status
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote: >> On Friday 04 August 2006 15:30, Christopher Browne wrote: >>> Thanks to all those that have been putting in effort to knock the dust >>> off of the 1.2 code. >>> >>> It has been a reasonably busy week of knocking off little problems >>> here and there: >>> >>> - A fix to let 1.2 "play well" with some restructuring of #includes in >>> 8.2 >>> - Added a new regression test that tests inheritance >>> - People turned up GCC to -Wall (generate *ALL* warnings), and have >>> stomped >>> virtually all warnings >>> - Cleaning up of Makefiles >>> - Cleaning up of SGML tagging problems in documentation >>> - Added a table with extra types (inet, numeric, float, various >>> geometric >>> types) to "test1" regression test >>> >>> Darcy discovered a bug in 8.2 with domains with checks, and it appears >>> a fix should be in place forthwith; the plan seems to be that in view >>> of holidays in Canada, we'll revisit 8.2-based testing on Tuesday, and >>> see about RC3 on Wednesday. >> A quick run through test/* on my 8.2 dev box come up clean, I'll see about >> setting up a several hundred gig test before I leave for the day, but so >> far >> I think we are green light for an RC3. the only outstanding issue I know >> of >> at this point in time is windows builds. > > Thinking about it, Windows may be less of an issue than was thought, > although there may be some work that *ought* to be done... > > The trouble Mastermind hit was that the process of building for Windows > seems underdocumented, not that we broke it recently. > > My suspicion is that what's missing is some feedback as to configure > changes that need to be done on Windows. I expect that people doing > builds on Windows have been making some changes and specifying much more > in terms of configure parameters than are needful on Unix-like systems. well I found some time to play a bit more with that and after some hacking on both the makefiles and the configure script we now have what maybe is a real issue: dllwrap -o slony1_funcs.dll --def slony1_funcs.def slony1_funcs.o win32ver.o /home/pgbuild/devel/pginst81/lib/postgresql/pgxs/src/utils/dllinit.o -L/home/pgbuild/devel/pginst81/lib -lpostgres Info: resolving _DateStyle by linking to __imp__DateStyle (auto-import) fu000001.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname' fu000002.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname' fu000003.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname' fu000004.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname' fu000005.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname' fu000006.o(.idata$3+0xc): more undefined references to `libpostgres_a_iname' follow nmth000000.o(.idata$4+0x0): undefined reference to `_nm__DateStyle' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status c:\MinGW\bin\dllwrap.exe: c:\MinGW\bin\gcc exited with status 1 make[2]: *** [slony1_funcs.dll] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pgbuild/devel/slony1-engine/src/backend' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pgbuild/devel/slony1-engine/src' make: *** [all] Error 2 that might point to an issue with the recent datestyle fixes ... Stefan
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony-I 1.2.0 RC2 status
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony-I 1.2.0 RC2 status
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list