Stefan Kaltenbrunner stefan
Sat Aug 5 08:52:51 PDT 2006
cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote:
>> On Friday 04 August 2006 15:30, Christopher Browne wrote:
>>> Thanks to all those that have been putting in effort to knock the dust
>>> off of the 1.2 code.
>>>
>>> It has been a reasonably busy week of knocking off little problems
>>> here and there:
>>>
>>> - A fix to let 1.2 "play well" with some restructuring of #includes in
>>> 8.2
>>> - Added a new regression test that tests inheritance
>>> - People turned up GCC to -Wall (generate *ALL* warnings), and have
>>> stomped
>>>   virtually all warnings
>>> - Cleaning up of Makefiles
>>> - Cleaning up of SGML tagging problems in documentation
>>> - Added a table with extra types (inet, numeric, float, various
>>> geometric
>>> types) to "test1" regression test
>>>
>>> Darcy discovered a bug in 8.2 with domains with checks, and it appears
>>> a fix should be in place forthwith; the plan seems to be that in view
>>> of holidays in Canada, we'll revisit 8.2-based testing on Tuesday, and
>>> see about RC3 on Wednesday.
>> A quick run through test/* on my 8.2 dev box come up clean, I'll see about
>> setting up a several hundred gig test before I leave for the day, but so
>> far
>> I think we are green light for an RC3.  the only outstanding issue I know
>> of
>> at this point in time is windows builds.
> 
> Thinking about it, Windows may be less of an issue than was thought,
> although there may be some work that *ought* to be done...
> 
> The trouble Mastermind hit was that the process of building for Windows
> seems underdocumented, not that we broke it recently.
> 
> My suspicion is that what's missing is some feedback as to configure
> changes that need to be done on Windows.  I expect that people doing
> builds on Windows have been making some changes and specifying much more
> in terms of configure parameters than are needful on Unix-like systems.

well I found some time to play a bit more with that and after some
hacking on both the makefiles and the configure script we now have what
maybe is a real issue:

dllwrap -o slony1_funcs.dll --def slony1_funcs.def slony1_funcs.o
win32ver.o
/home/pgbuild/devel/pginst81/lib/postgresql/pgxs/src/utils/dllinit.o
-L/home/pgbuild/devel/pginst81/lib -lpostgres
Info: resolving _DateStyle by linking to __imp__DateStyle (auto-import)
fu000001.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname'
fu000002.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname'
fu000003.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname'
fu000004.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname'
fu000005.o(.idata$3+0xc): undefined reference to `libpostgres_a_iname'
fu000006.o(.idata$3+0xc): more undefined references to
`libpostgres_a_iname' follow
nmth000000.o(.idata$4+0x0): undefined reference to `_nm__DateStyle'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
c:\MinGW\bin\dllwrap.exe: c:\MinGW\bin\gcc exited with status 1
make[2]: *** [slony1_funcs.dll] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pgbuild/devel/slony1-engine/src/backend'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pgbuild/devel/slony1-engine/src'
make: *** [all] Error 2

that might point to an issue with the recent datestyle fixes ...

Stefan



More information about the Slony1-general mailing list