Tue Oct 25 22:12:38 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.2 RPMs/SRPMs?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Excessive Swap Memory Usage on Slave
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Philip Yarra wrote: >> Yeah, I had no time to build RPMs for for RHEL3. Will do it later today. > > When I get it built I'll put it somewhere for you to grab if you like. I'd love it. (I don't have that much time until Sunday :( ) >> SRPM suits all Red Hat'ish platforms. > > Yes, that's why I was puzzled by the seperate SRPM directories here: > http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/slony/1.1.2/srpms/ > But perhaps one's for 8.0.3 and the other is for 8.0.4? Oh that's my mistake. They important tag might be PG8.0.4?there. FC4 is unimportant. Oh, SuSE's SRPM is a bit different. >> This is/was a bug of RHEL 3 and it was fixed in newer versions. > > I see the same thing going back to RH7.3 (so likely also on RHEL2.1). Yes. >> Here is >> quick solution to solve your problem: >> >> [symlinking] > > OK, two issues I see with that approach: > 1) even after symlinking krb5.h, the compile fails to find profile.h (also > in /usr/kerberos/include) - yes, easy fix is to symlink that too, so not a > big issue Yeah, I forgot to write that you should symlink all. > 2) it adds additional steps for people wanting to build from source pre > RHEL4.0 (which I guess probably isn't that many) > > I don't see any penalty for changing the spec file to include: > CPPFLAGS="${CPPFLAGS} -I%{_includedir}/et -I/usr/kerberos/include" > export CPPFLAGS > CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -I%{_includedir}/et -I/usr/kerberos/include" > export CFLAGS > > Would that be okay? Works for me. I'll be committing these to spec file in a minute, to both branches. > 'make rpm' for the source tarball still has the same issue with finding > kerberos headers. I suppose putting -I/usr/kerberos/include in the Makefile > would achieve the same end for us poor RHEL3.0 (and earlier) users :-) :) > I'm not keen to go symlinking header files, I'd rather the build process > worked for the platform I use, if it can be done non-intrusively. I'm not > trying to be difficult, I just like to keep things simple. Thanks for your help. The more we use RPMs, they will have more quality. Regards, -- Devrim GUNDUZ Kivi Bili?im Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.2 RPMs/SRPMs?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Excessive Swap Memory Usage on Slave
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list