David Fetter wrote:

>On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:51:53AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
>  
>
>>On 10/18/2005 2:19 AM, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Jan Wieck wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I am a little confused. There was a big outcry with the 1.1.1 release 
>>>>that the spec files would have needed updating and such. Now we are 
>>>>aiming for a quick 1.1.2 to fix that situation among some nasty bugs.
>>>>
>>>>The bugs are all fixed, but the spec files in the REL_1_1_STABLE branch 
>>>>are still untouched since July. Is anyone actually working on these?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Ok, I just committed the fix for the problem reported in
>>>
>>>http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/2005-October/003105.html
>>>
>>>both to -HEAD and -REL_1_1_STABLE . Sorry for being late. I think we are 
>>>ready for 1.1.2 and beyond.
>>>      
>>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>I guess we're ready to create a tarball then.
>>
>>Chris, can you build everything and send me the resulting .tar.bz
>>files?  I will upload them under a temporary name then and everyone
>>will have another 24 hours to check them out.
>>
>>Does that sound like a plan?
>>    
>>
>
>Sounds fantastic.  What say we start mentioning the tests we've run on
>the list?  My Secret Plan is to start putting together a more formal
>QA and release process...
>  
>
Well, I think we already have some "Secret Sauce" to start from, in the
form of Darcy's scripts.

Methinks what we ought to do is to commit them in somewhere in the tree,
and start building some further tests based on them...