On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:24:52AM +0000, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Christopher Browne wrote:
> 
> > 
> >It's just that "completeness sake" dictates mentioning that this isn't
> >the only scenario where a set can have no tables.  I can't call the
> >problem "solved" unless all of the scenarios are addressed.
> 
> A reasonable use-case of empty sets is replication of ddl scripts. One 
> might like a set dedicated to ddl scripts only.

You don't replicate ddl scripts. You replicate tables and sequences
only. A ddl script is applied to a set, but if that set doesn't contain
anything, I don't know how useful it'd be.

Are you thinking of something else maybe?   

Tim

> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

-- 
Tim Goodaire    416-673-4126    tgoodair at ca.afilias.info
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20051006/eecd3331/attachment.bin