On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 04:27:47PM -0700, elein wrote:
> Yes, it should. But it doesn't.  I believe any message is ever
> sent to the 3rd node. This is the same in my example.  See also the sl_setsync
> table.  It has a reference to node 1 (or 10).

Do we have a reproducible case yet?  It sure looks like a bug, but
without being able to isolate it, I dunno how we're going to fix it.

A


-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs at crankycanuck.ca
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
		--George Orwell