Tue Nov 29 18:11:11 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Stop slon process?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony ignores port spec in ADMIN CONNINFO?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/28/2005 2:00 PM, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Nov 28, 2005, at 1:37 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote: > >> and then kill -9 the process(s). > > kill -9 is a "rude" way to kill processes. a normal TERM signal > should be sufficient and gives slon time to cleanup after itself. > > kill -9 should be the method of last resort to kill any process. I do agree that -9 is a bad habit. Although in the case of slon, not much harm will be done as all work is covered by transactions in the corresponding DB connections and killing slon the rude way will simply rollback. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Stop slon process?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony ignores port spec in ADMIN CONNINFO?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list