Wed May 11 18:14:10 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: [HACKERS] Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: [HACKERS] Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:36:44PM +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > Why does slony use its own transaction id type (xxid) in the first > place, why can't we just use standard xid ? I believe it has to do with comparison operators; they didn't exist in the way Jan wanted, and he didn't want to create new (and potentially-future-conflicting) operators there. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir? --attr. John Maynard Keynes
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: [HACKERS] Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: [HACKERS] Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list