Fri Mar 4 22:24:46 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] curious size difference in dumps from origin or replica
- Next message: [Slony1-general] curious size difference in dumps from origin or replica
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 4, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Jan Wieck wrote: >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2916941855 Mar 3 04:38 mm.03-Mar-2005.dump >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2359870138 Mar 4 11:51 mm.04-Mar-2005.dump >> the March 2 and 3 dumps were from the origin, and march 4 from the >> replica. This is a "-Fc" format pg_dump of the entire database. >> And yes, I'm still dumping the schema from the origin also :-) > > But you do dump the schema with the data anyway - which is useless and > corrupted on the subscriber, so you really want to have a data-only > dump from it. A data only dump from origin and subscriber can only > differ in the data contained in the sl_log_1 and sl_event tables. > yeah, i can just ignore the schema in that dump, too! but how on earth can they differ by 500Mb+ *compressed*? all the data *seems* to be there. i guess i really need to re-double-triple-quadruple check it... Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] curious size difference in dumps from origin or replica
- Next message: [Slony1-general] curious size difference in dumps from origin or replica
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list