Wed Jun 29 16:02:33 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] adding rules to replicated tables
- Next message: [Slony1-general] adding rules to replicated tables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Victoria Parsons wrote: > Hi, > > I am replicating a database out and the slaves need to keep logs of > changes to some tables. Before replication, I had a > tablename_changelog. Whenever the table <tablename> gets data > inserted/updated/deleted it followed a rule to write the old and new > data to the changelog. There is a rule on the change log that sends > out a notify when it is written to. > > Now that I am replicating the main table data down, I only want to > keep these changelog tables on each slave, not on master. The problem > I have is that when slony sets itself up in my database it removes (or > hides) the rules on <tablename> that write my changes into the > changelog table. These rules won't adversly affect my replication as > they don't ever write into the replicated table, only read from. I can > add them back in after replication is setup, but then I hit > difficulties trying to anything else with slonik commands, like > uninstall table or node, as these rules "shouldn't" be there. I'm > assuming this will break any change of master scripts aswell. > > Is there anything clever I can do other than setup replication, create > rules on slaves, remove the extra rules on slaves before > uniinistalling/changing master node, then recreate rules afterwards. > May I point you to the STORE TRIGGER command? <http://linuxfinances.info/info/stmtstoretrigger.html> That allows triggers to be "reactivated." The effect there is that the triggers are applied to ALL nodes; that may not be exactly what you want. It would be a neat idea to improve the STORE TRIGGER command so that triggers could be activated just on a particular set of nodes. The challenging part would be to 'reshape' the triggers when something like MOVE SET is run. It could take a fair bit of configuration information to handle that for general cases. Indeed, configuring that to be handled "automagically" strikes me as requiring a pretty complicated configuration scheme :-(. It's certainly not impossible; a carefully thought-out proposal for how to handle it needs to emerge...
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] adding rules to replicated tables
- Next message: [Slony1-general] adding rules to replicated tables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list