Tue Jun 14 18:07:18 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Nodes in multiple Clusters
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Nodes in multiple Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:04:13PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > The cluster-specific stuff resides in the _clustername namespace, so > there's no reason why you couldn't have a particular database > participating in multiple clusters. > > I don't think anyone has tried it, so you may uncover new ground, and > new problems. > I have 3 different clusters on one database. It seems to work fine. The various sets are distinct (by definition) so I haven't seen any locking or deadlock problems related to running multiple clusters. -- "We can no more blame our loss of freedom on Congressmen than we can prostitution on pimps. Both simply provide broker services for their customers." -- Dr. Walter Williams
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Nodes in multiple Clusters
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Nodes in multiple Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list