On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 09:17:42AM -0400, cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote:
> > DEBUG2 remoteWorkerThread_1: SYNC 1087 processing
> > DEBUG2 remoteWorkerThread_1: syncing set 1 with 0 table(s) from provider 1

> Based just on the last line, I can point to the issue.

> The problem is that you set up a subscription to a replication set that
> involves no tables at all.

> There is a pathology there that if you aren't replicating any tables, the
> query that looks for table data fails in much the manner that you see.

That was exactly the problem. Thanks!


> We haven't looked to fixing it because it's kind of a silly case;
> replication is arguably NOT broken because you're not replicating any
> tables.

> You'll presumably have to unsubscribe set 1 and create a new set that
> actually *does* have tables in it.

Ok, but a warning would be nice anyway.



Joachim

-- 
"Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk ?"