David Parker dparker
Wed Jan 12 22:13:17 PST 2005
I have 3 nodes A,B,C. 

A and B are "clustered" such that B is just a backup for A, and needs to get all changes made on A replicated. A in its turn is a subscriber to a set of tables from C, and also has some tables for which it is master. 

Now, for B to be a full backup to A, it needs to be subscribed to the A-mastered tables, and to the set from C, as well.

My question: is it better/more efficient for B to just subscribe directly to C, or for it to subscribe to C's set via A, with A having forwarding turned on?

TIA for any information/opinions/corrections....

- DAP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Parker    Tazz Networks    (401) 709-5130
?


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list