Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>People,
>>>
>>>It is probably not totally uncommon to have multiple slon backends 
>>>running on the same machine, replicating different databases. For 
>>>unix, this is simple - you just start a separate slon daemon. For 
>>>win32 it's not as simple. I see three options for dealing 
>>
>>with this on win32:
>>
>>I'd think putting all your data in multiple schemas in one 
>>database would make for a decent compromise.

Certainly not. In most cases there was a reason to put the data in 
different databases, not schemas. Example: Often the same app has to run 
against several sets of data, but can't deal with schemas.

I'd opt for version 1), because this seems the most flexible way 
especially in terms of controllability.

Regards,
Andreas