Wed Apr 13 13:14:50 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] cleanup
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Table has no unique index - is this a bug?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks for the response - I should have checked the most excellent FAQ first! I'm pretty sure that's what was causing it. I just have to find the bandwidth to upgrade to 1.0.5, though maybe waiting for 1.1 at this point makes more sense.... Thanks again. - DAP >> Running 1.0.2, I have a replication cluster with one set >defined, with >> a slon running. I don't have any subscribers currently. I >would expect >> the local slon to just clean out sl_log_1, but that table keeps >> growing. I don't see any errors in the slon log. Is my understanding >> correct that the log table should be getting cleaned out, or >do there >> have to be subscriptions for some reason for this to happen? > >Version 1.0.2 has an issue that it doesn't do enough cleanup >of the sl_confirm table. > >I'll bet you used to have some nodes that are gone now? Those >nodes presumably left entrails in sl_confirm that are causing >the cleanup code to think it should hold onto the sl_log_1 >data until the (now gone) node comes to pick up the data. > >This is addressed in the FAQ under the following question... >http://linuxfinances.info/info/faq.html >Q: After dropping a node, sl_log_1 isn't getting purged out anymore. > >The resolution involves deleting the obsolete sl_confirm entries. > >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] cleanup
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Table has no unique index - is this a bug?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list