Niels Breet wrote:

>>We're at the point now where we need to see about freezing 1.1 against
>>further changes so we can see about getting a release out.  There are
>>rather a lot of improvements, and it seems worthwhile to see about taking
>>advantage of some of them :-).
>>
>>I am aware of two things still undergoing some effort:
>>
>>
>>1.  Quoting handling - so that identifiers like "user" can be names of
>>tables/columns
>>    
>>
>
>Just added another patch, not all problems are fixed yet. Indexes that
>need quoting are still broken.
>
>  
>
As long as this hasn't broken existing cases that used to work, I don't 
see a problem with having a patch for this come in a little later; is 
that immanent?

By the way, it would be a slick idea to add a "ducttape" script to check 
this stuff; should be pretty easy...

>>2.  Attempts to support Win32
>>
>>    
>>
>It is too much work to fix that in time.
>  
>
Agreed.

>Another thing I noticed today is the slonik function "UPDATE FUNCTIONS".
>If you are running PostgreSQL 8.x.x then it doesn't work. There are
>no separate 8.0 slony1_funcs scripts yet etc etc.
>  
>
It shouldn't; for versions 8.0 and 8.x (there isn't yet an 8.x for 
x!=0), the major version for functions is based on version 7.4.

See line 1799 in src/slonik/slonik.c

Do you see a test case breaking?