Tue Sep 21 23:46:08 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Understanding README examples
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Understanding README examples
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday September 21 2004 10:33, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> The other way around ... on the subscribers (slaves), the subscribed
> tables have their triggers and rules parked on their PK index OID ...
> which is ugly and eggebeh and pfui, but it's the way it is for now. So
> simply dropping the replication schema will leave the slave database in
> an inconsistent state.
When I drop the slave's replication schema, "pg_dump -s foo" does not show
any trace whatsoever of any slony schema, triggers, etc. I would have
expected the dependency to show up in the dump. What am I missing? Here's
what I'm doing:
cluster name = replication;
node 1 admin conninfo = 'user=db1dba host=localhost port=9801 dbname=foo';
node 2 admin conninfo = 'user=db2dba host=localhost port=9802 dbname=foo';
init cluster ( id = 1, comment = 'Master' );
create set ( id = 1, origin = 1, comment = 'All tables' );
set add table (
id = 13135204, set id = 1, origin = 1,
fully qualified name = 'public.foo',
comment = 'Table public.foo'
);
store node ( id = 2, comment = 'Slave' );
store path ( server = 1, client = 2, conninfo = 'user=db1dba host=localhost
port=9801 dbname=foo' );
store path ( server = 2, client = 1, conninfo = 'user=db2dba host=localhost
port=9802 dbname=foo' );
store listen ( origin = 1, provider = 1, receiver = 2 );
store listen ( origin = 2, provider = 2, receiver = 1 );
subscribe set ( id = 1, provider = 1, receiver = 2, forward = no);
Ed
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Understanding README examples
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Understanding README examples
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list