On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 10:21 -0600, Ed L. wrote:
> I'm replicating from 8.0.0beta3 to 7.4.6 (had to doctor the schema dump a 
> bit), and seeing redundant setvals from slon even though the sequence has 
> not changed at all.  Not sure if that's a bug or just inefficient.

Hmmm, it would make more sense for Slony to internally track the
progress of each sequence, so it doesn't blindly do setval() each timem
wouldn't it?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift


> Ed
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general