Fri Oct 8 15:11:47 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] initial copy going for 6 days now...
- Next message: [Slony1-general] initial copy going for 6 days now...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 6, 2004, at 11:51 AM, Vivek Khera wrote: > Well, I'm now convinced that something is wrong. There's just no way > in heck it should take 6 days to replicate my large table across two > machines, even if they are cheap-o IDE disks... :-) > Well, there was a way in heck (Where's Phil with his spoon?): DEBUG2 remoteWorkerThread_2: 3448517395 bytes copied for table public.msg_recipients [[ several SYNC events here... ]] DEBUG2 remoteWorkerThread_2: 617457.234 seconds to copy table public.msg_recipients based on the current table that's copying (about 40% the size of the big one) it finished around 4am today. Solid 7 days + 4 hours or so. So I figure around tuesday I'll be all replicated in my test! :-) Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2476 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20041008/a167c0ac/smime.bin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] initial copy going for 6 days now...
- Next message: [Slony1-general] initial copy going for 6 days now...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list