Mon Nov 1 18:40:39 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] redundant setval calls
- Next message: [Slony1-general] redundant setval calls
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 12:05:18PM -0600, Ed L. wrote: > > > > It could impose a pretty severe memory footprint with a lot of > > sequences, though. > > By my rough guess, it will take around 128 bytes to store all data for a > sequence along with a few data structure pointers. Well, if you can do it in 128 bytes, that's a different story. How do you calculate that, though? I'd be interested to know. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir? --attr. John Maynard Keynes
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] redundant setval calls
- Next message: [Slony1-general] redundant setval calls
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list