Fri Jul 23 21:07:54 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] partitioning with replication
- Next message: [Slony1-general] partitioning with replication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
You are trying to demonstrate that child tables do not inherit referential integrity constraints from their parents? Yes, that is correct. You have to set them up on your own. I agree it can be annoying. -Dan Daniel J. Wright wright at pair.com Lead Software Developer, pairNIC https://www.pairnic.com pair Networks, Inc. http://www.pair.com On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:15:55PM -0400, Dan Wright wrote: > > > It sounds like you are doing the kind of thing that table > > inheritance is supposed to solve. If you use inheritance in your DB > > tables, you could get exactly what you are asking for from slony > > right now. > > Table inheritance is a Bad Thing(TM) in its current implementation. > Please find attached an example of why this is so. > > Cheers, > D > -- > David Fetter david at fetter.org http://fetter.org/ > phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 > > Remember to vote! >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] partitioning with replication
- Next message: [Slony1-general] partitioning with replication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list