Darcy Buskermolen darcy
Sat Jul 10 23:55:43 PDT 2004
On July 10, 2004 01:14 pm, Erik G. Burrows wrote:
> Sure, no problem. For my education, what made changing argv a headache?
>
> -Erik
>
> > On 7/10/2004 1:47 PM, Erik G. Burrows wrote:
> > > I've only been using Slony-I for a few days, but I already love it!
> > > It's going to make database migrations and upgrades much, much easier.
> > > However, I didn't like the fact that the PostgreSQL connection string
> > > passed to the slon process shows up in 'ps' output.
> > >
> > > Attached is my patch to slon.c to erase the argv entry with the
> > > connection string after slon finishes processing it's arguments, and
> > > restore it in case of a restart. I'm not sure how portable this fix is,
> > > but it should work on most *nix platforms, I think. I hope you find it
> > > useful.
> >
> > We know from the PostgreSQL main project how much of a headache mucking
> > with the commandline arguments is. I would much more prefer changing the
> > slony commandline into taking a filename argument where to find all the
> > configuration parameters that are now passed with switches. Would you be
> > willing to rework it into something like that?


My understanding is the existing .pgpass (More information can be found at 
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/libpq-pgpass.html) already does 
this for us.

-- 
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx:  250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list